← All studies

1965 · Cosyns — Detection of minimal left-right shunts by hydrogen inhalation.

Original title: [Detection of minimal left-right shunts by hydrogen inhalation].

Super-Abstract

This study assessed the sensitivity of hydrogen inhalation in detecting minimal (small) left-to-right intracardiac shunts — a clinical challenge where other methods of the era often failed. The high electrochemical sensitivity of the platinum electrode to H₂ gave this technique an advantage in identifying haemodynamically insignificant but anatomically real shunts. (Acta Cardiologica, 1965.)

Classified as a Pilot / Observational study using . See Methodology for how we grade evidence.

Commentary

Detecting small intracardiac shunts — particularly patent foramen ovale or small atrial/ventricular septal defects — was a significant diagnostic challenge in the pre-echocardiography era. This study focused specifically on the lower limit of detection of the hydrogen indicator technique for this purpose. A key advantage of H₂ is the extremely high sensitivity of platinum electrodes, making it possible to detect trace amounts of shunt flow that might be invisible to dye-dilution or radiographic methods. This is a diagnostic sensitivity study, not an H₂ therapy study. No abstract text was available for this article.

Key quotes

  1. „Detection of minimal left-right shunts by hydrogen inhalation.“ — title-level summary — no abstract available; H₂ as sensitive diagnostic tracer for minimal cardiac shunts

Our assessment

This study has no relevance to H₂ therapy. It is a cardiac diagnostic sensitivity study — evaluating the detection limit of the hydrogen indicator technique for small intracardiac shunts. H₂ is an inert tracer. No abstract was available; assessment based on title, journal, and established historical context of the hydrogen indicator method. Off-topic for a therapeutic H₂ database.

Study design

Source & links

Screenshot of the PubMed page

Screenshot — PubMed 5294201

This page mirrors the published abstract (© the authors / publisher) for reference and citation. The canonical source is the PubMed record linked above. This is not medical advice.