← All studies

2024 · Tan — The Effect of 14-Day Consumption of Hydrogen-Rich Water Alleviates Fatigue but Does Not Ameliorate Dyspnea in Long-COVID Patients: A Pilot, Single-Blind, and Randomized, Controlled Trial

Original title: The Effect of 14-Day Consumption of Hydrogen-Rich Water Alleviates Fatigue but Does Not Ameliorate Dyspnea in Long-COVID Patients: A Pilot, Single-Blind, and Randomized, Controlled Trial

Super-Abstract

Hydrogen-rich water alleviates exhaustion in Long-COVID — but not shortness of breath. In a 14-day randomized pilot trial (n = 32), H₂ water lowered fatigue, increased the distance in the 6-minute walk test, and markedly improved leg strength and sleep quality; shortness of breath, however, did not improve. (Nutrients, 2024.)

Classified as a RCT study using Drinking (HRW). See Methodology for how we grade evidence.

Commentary

Long COVID hits many people with persistent exhaustion — and that is exactly where this study comes in. It is a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study: of 55 originally recruited, 32 remained, 16 each in the H₂ water group and the placebo water group. Both drank either hydrogen-rich or plain water for 14 days. Testing used established instruments: the Fatigue Severity Scale, the 6-minute walk test, the 30-second chair-stand test for leg strength, a dyspnea scale, the Pittsburgh Sleep Index and a stress questionnaire. The numbers are concrete and partly clear: fatigue fell significantly (p = 0.046), the distance in the 6-minute walk test rose clearly (p < 0.001, large effect with Cohen's d = 1.01), chair-stand performance improved (p = 0.002, d = 1.19), and sleep got better too (p = 0.012, d = 1.27). Important for honesty: shortness of breath did not improve (p = 0.556), and anxiety/depression/stress also remained unchanged. What it means: H₂ water appears to help above all with exhaustion, endurance, leg strength and sleep, but not with shortness of breath. Honestly: a small sample (n = 32) and only single-blind — i.e. weaker than a double-blind design.

Key quotes

  1. „The effects of HRW on lowering FSS scores (p = 0.046 ...) and improving total distance in the 6WMT (p < 0.001 ..., d = 1.010), total time for the 30s-CST (p = 0.002 ..., d = 1.190), and PSQI scores (p = 0.012 ..., d = 1.274) compared to PW were of a significantly moderate effect size“ — the concrete proofs of effect with effect sizes
  2. „there was no significant difference in mMRC score (p = 0.556) or DASS-21 score (p > 0.143).“ — no improvement in shortness of breath, anxiety, depression, stress
  3. „HRW might be an effective strategy for alleviating fatigue and improving cardiorespiratory endurance, musculoskeletal function, and sleep quality. Still, it does not ameliorate dyspnea among Long-COVID patients.“ — the balanced conclusion

Our assessment

Relevant for H₂ water applications in the context of exhaustion, recovery and post-infection convalescence — a big topic since the pandemic. A strength is the honest, differentiated reporting: an effect where it is measurable (fatigue, endurance, sleep), no whitewashing on shortness of breath. The reported effect sizes (Cohen's d up to 1.27) are notable. Limitation, stated honestly: declared as a pilot study, a small sample (n = 32 of 55), only single-blind (not double-blind) — therefore classified as a pilot/near-open-label design. Subjective endpoints like fatigue are more susceptible to expectation effects when blinding is only single.

Study design

Abstract

(1) Background: Hydrogen (H2) may be a potential therapeutic agent for managing Long COVID symptoms due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. However, more scientific literature is needed to describe the effects of H2 administration on treating symptoms. A study aimed to investigate the impact of hydrogen-rich water (HRW) administration on the fatigue and dyspnea of Long-COVID patients for 14 consecutive days. (2) Methods: In this randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study, 55 participants were recruited, and 23 of them were excluded. A total of 32 eligible participants were randomized into a hydrogen-rich water (HRW) group (n = 16) and a placebo water (PW) group (n = 16) in which they were instructed to consume hydrogen-rich water or placebo water for 14 days, respectively. The participants completed the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), 30 s Chair Stand Test (30s-CST), Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Rating Scale (mMRC), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and depression anxiety stress scale (DASS-21) before and after the intervention. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze the effects of HRW. Cohen's d values were used to assess the effect size when significance was observed. The mean change with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was also reported. (3) Results: The effects of HRW on lowering FSS scores (p = 0.046, [95% CI = -20.607, -0.198, d = 0.696] and improving total distance in the 6WMT (p < 0.001, [95% CI = 41.972, 61.891], d = 1.010), total time for the 30s-CST (p = 0.002, [95% CI = 1.570, 6.314], d = 1.190), and PSQI scores (p = 0.012, [95% CI = -5.169, 0.742], d = 1.274) compared to PW were of a significantly moderate effect size, while there was no significant difference in mMRC score (p = 0.556) or DASS-21 score (p > 0.143). (4) Conclusions: This study demonstrates that HRW might be an effective strategy for alleviating fatigue and improving cardiorespiratory endurance, musculoskeletal function, and sleep quality. Still, it does not ameliorate dyspnea among Long-COVID patients.

Source & links

Screenshot of the PubMed page

Screenshot — PubMed 38794767

This page mirrors the published abstract (© the authors / publisher) for reference and citation. The canonical source is the PubMed record linked above. This is not medical advice.